Customer Rating:  
Summary: Makes the first one look better at least
Comment: This sequel only brings the first one up a little. I really can't remember who survived the first one, I think there were just two survivors. This one barely strings the two movies together. It has more blood and bodily fluids and still seems to throw them at you just for the sake of it. There are shots that seem to come out of nowhere, still no explanation as to the origin of the creatures and what they are. The only good thing I can say for it was that they did have the guts to kill a child and an old lady in the movie. You don't see that everyday, even from the most hardened film maker. The monster costumes looked ridiculous in the daylight and kind of killed the illusion. How the first one rated a sequel I'll never know. I doubt this one will lead to a third, though. The ending also annoyed me, but I won't spoil it for anyone who hasn't seen it, that is, if you still want to. I suggest you don't. There are much better uses of your time, like picking your toenails, or sorting your socks or maybe counting the crumbs in your toaster.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Sloppy indeed...
Comment: First of all, like a lot of other reviewers who gave a 1/5, I LOVED the first Feast. It is in my top 5 favorite gore-horror flicks. But the sequel was 100% sloppy garbage.
It starts off ok, picking up the morning after the 1st one ended. The sister of the biker-chick shows up to find her sister's arm in the mouth of a dog, and the injured old bartender hiding under a truck. So, out of reasons of vendetta, she takes the bartender hostage, looking for "Bozo", whom she thinks is responsbile for her sister's death. Not to give away the storyline to those who want to see this, but that is the only piece of plot I could comprehend in 100 minutes. She never even finds "Bozo"!
The acting is putrid, effects were even worse, and the "monsters" look like glorified puppets. It almost seems as though the movie was made on an elementary school's cafeteria budget.
Unfortunately, a 3rd movie is/has been made. I guess it cant be worse...
Customer Rating:
Summary: surprised
Comment: this was way better than expected first time i've seen chelsea richards where's she been hideing wish she would have had a bigger part. maybe they will make another one and give her alittle more of a part. every one in it really did well considering a pretty weak plot i hope they make a feast 111 and tune it up a notch
Customer Rating:
Summary: Feast II Sloppy Seconds
Comment: i think its hilarious reading through these reviews, people are talking about how feast 1 was some amazing gift to cinema, and i am not putting it down at all, i personally loved both films. however i dont know if some of the people here who reviewed feast 2 have even seen feast 1. first of all feast has always been a campy and over the top, does anyone remember henry rollins character putting a dead monster on a stick and hanging it out the window. i seem to also recall a woman getting assualted by something in her mouth... what was that again? hey wait a minute, doesnt the same thing that happens to the grandmother in the second one, happen to a fat redneck in the first?? people, if you are truly a fan of the first feast, you will like this, its better than the first in my opinion, and this is coming from a true fan of horror. i'm talking directors like fred vogel, peter jackson, sam raimi, dario argento, kind of movies. if your favorite horror movies include crap like the happening, then this movie is not for you, stick to your watered down horror. but if you truly enjoyed the first feast, this will leave you with a good movie going experience.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Funny as He**
Comment: This movie was one of the funniest I've seen in a while!!
SPOILER****
When you're shooting midgets over buildings and having a dead alien squirting fluids on people causing a pukefest, that's just good entertainment right there. No it wasn't like the first one, but that's OK, because the first one was riddled with graphic gore scenes intent on shock only. This one has it's gore and it has some questionable ethics (which are also funny as he**), but it's not the sole basis of the movie.
|
