PDA

View Full Version : 2003 - THE YEAR OF THE NEOCONS!


DRMIZER
12-08-2003, 11:24 AM
The new conservatives, or neocons, have had a very successful year. Based on their ideas which are grounded in Judeo-Christian superstition, they have started an unnecessary war in Iraq which has already cost hundreds of young American's their lives, as well as the lives of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians. The neocon who first brought forward the idea to attack Iraq even though Iraq never had anything to do with the 9/11 attack on the US, is Paul Wolfowitz the Jewish US Deputy Defense Secretary. According to Time Magazine, January 27, 2003, page 28, it was Wolfowitz who first presented the idea to Bush.

The neocons believe the Bible when it states in Deuteronomy 7:6 that the Jews are, "above all people that are upon the face of the earth." Bible believing Christians believe this as much as their Jewish superiors. The Christian neocons work as hard as the Jewish neocons in putting forth their agenda which is to make the world safe for Israel at America's expense. Too bad there aren't any Deists in high places in Washington! (There used to be - the first five presidents of the US were Deists)

The hypocrisy of the neocons is evident everywhere. One example is a key tool for the neocons, George Dubyah Bush. When giving his address to the UN on September 12, 2002 he said, "Are Security Council Resolutions to be honored and enforced, or cast aside without consequence? Will the United Nations serve the purpose of its founding, or will it be irrelevant? We want the resolutions of the world's most important multilateral body to be enforced."

When it comes to enemies of Israel Bush and the neocons and Congress want UN Resolutions that will help defeat Israel's enemies enforced. When it comes to UN Resolutions against Israel, the kosher gang in DC not only ignore them but actually veto them when given a chance.

A good example is UN Resolution 487 passed in 1981 which calls for Israel to place its nuclear facilities under the safeguard of the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency. Israel has ignored this Resolution. According to Bush policy applied to Iraq, the US should invade Israel to make them comply with the UN Resolution. I don't think that's going to happen!

This double standard of American policy is at the heart of terrorist attacks against the US. If we didn't have it, we never would have let Israel build, according to the investigative journalist Seymour Hersh, 300 nuclear warheads, develop chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction, attack it's neighbors at will, build a wall that in effect takes land from the Palestinians, kill over 30 US servicemen on the USS Liberty, kill an American peace activist by running her over with a bulldozer, etc., etc., etc. When Israel uses American fighter jets and attack helicopters to kill Palestinian men, women and children, that builds hatred in the survivors for America.

The neocons and their allies in Israel are working hard to make 2004 a success as well. They are pushing Congress to take steps against Syria and Iran. From looking at the web site of the lobby group for Israel ( www.aipac.org ) it looks like Iran will be hit first, then Syria. How many more young innocent Americans will die to fulfill this kosher neocon agenda???

tudhope
12-08-2003, 12:27 PM
"How many more young innocent Americans will die to fulfill this kosher neocon agenda???"



why taint your post with a comment like this?

SantaMonica
12-08-2003, 12:33 PM
I for one, don't know what you're talking about DRMIZER.

Seems like a whole lotta hate...combined with a good helping of rehashed propoganda and a healthy smattering of plain naivette'

No offense.

gopman
12-08-2003, 01:48 PM
Nope, he got us- that's exactly why the GOP is doing it. It's not becuase Saddam was supporting terrorists who killed over 3000 innocent people and severely hurt our economy (whether or not he was directly connected to those specific terrorists).

One thing that confuses me is that if the right is motivated by its extremist Christian agenda, then why are we working with the Jews? Why not neocons in other Christian countries?

Simon666
12-08-2003, 04:37 PM
Originally posted by gopman
Nope, he got us- that's exactly why the GOP is doing it. It's not becuase Saddam was supporting terrorists who killed over 3000 innocent people and severely hurt our economy (whether or not he was directly connected to those specific terrorists).

One thing that confuses me is that if the right is motivated by its extremist Christian agenda, then why are we working with the Jews? Why not neocons in other Christian countries?
Jerusalem and Israel have an important place in the Bible, other Christian countries not.

gopman
12-08-2003, 05:04 PM
So we would be willing to put aside our extremist differences because they control the holy land? That's not how it's been working for the last 50 years, as demonstrated by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict- why would it start now? It seems to me we would want to destroy Israel and claim it for our extremist Christian selves.

DRMIZER
12-09-2003, 10:03 AM
Originally posted by SantaMonica
I for one, don't know what you're talking about DRMIZER.

Seems like a whole lotta hate...combined with a good helping of rehashed propoganda and a healthy smattering of plain naivette'

No offense.
Interesting post. Can you expand on this for everyone?

DRMIZER
12-09-2003, 10:04 AM
Originally posted by gopman
So we would be willing to put aside our extremist differences because they control the holy land? That's not how it's been working for the last 50 years, as demonstrated by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict- why would it start now? It seems to me we would want to destroy Israel and claim it for our extremist Christian selves.

Or for more thought, why don't we take the Palestinian position?

The Man
12-09-2003, 04:57 PM
Originally posted by SantaMonica
I for one, don't know what you're talking about DRMIZER.

Seems like a whole lotta hate...combined with a good helping of rehashed propoganda and a healthy smattering of plain naivette'

No offense.

Hummmmmmm. I read it fairly easily. That truth is sometimes confusing, I must admit!:o

SantaMonica
12-09-2003, 05:04 PM
Originally posted by The Man
Hummmmmmm. I read it fairly easily. That truth is sometimes confusing, I must admit!:o

The reading was fairly easy. Hatred, propoganda and naivete. QUite clear. What wasn't clear was the point of being that irrational and...pointless.:sleep:

TheBrain
12-09-2003, 05:21 PM
Just for the record, the Bush family is not at all Zionist, and this administration is certainly not "pro-Israel".