King James was a homosexual pedophile who thought that Jesus was in love with John.

[BlackAsCoal]

Always interesting to hear Christians who have no clue whats in the bible, or what its about.

History will tell you that King James was indeed a pedophile who enjoyed sex with small boys while bathed in animals blood, which makes the use of scripture to denigrate gays, all the more ignorant.

The decadent King thought that Jesus was in love with John, and stated so in an English court.

The bible tells several stories of homesexuality including one story thats told in the bible 3 different times of a man who met another in a market, took him home, and was followed by a gang to his home. Once they were inside the gang called to the man "send out the starnger so that we can have sex with him". The man refused and sent his virgin daughter out instead so that the gang could take out their lust on her.

King James who commissioned to non-christians, Shakesphere and Bacon to rewrite the bible. Why would anyone need to rewrite the words of "God"?

Lets see .. what did King James change?

Prior to the King James version, the word "slave" is in the bible 176 times. More than the words "sister" or "brother", and almost as many times as the word "mother". After the King James version, "slave" is mentioned only twice, and has been replaced by nebulous terms like handmaiden and bondsman.

Why would King James do that? ... To hide the purpose of the bible from the masses. ... Its purpose ... how to be a slave.

When you can make the connection of Spartacus of the Roman era, to John Brown of American slavery, the bibles purpose becomes clear.

[Blueangel]

An interesting theory.

I knew those facts about King James, but I'm less sure of the links with Shakespear and Bacon. I'll have to research that.

To me, reading the King James version of the Bible is akin to reading the book of the film, instead of the book that inspired the film. It often bares little resemblance to the concept of the original author.

[xexon]

The morals of ancient times cannot be viewed with modern eyes.

Times were quite different then. It was not uncommon for homosexual relations, incest, and child relations to be the norm in those days.

Its just the way it was.



x

[Captain America]

Evidence points to the fact that Sir Francis Bacon was actually "Shakespere". He used that "penname" for his artistic writings.

And yes, King James did commission Bacon to head up the committee that re-wrote the Bible to be more conducive to Monarchy than to an emperor such as Constitine. King James was illiterate and could barely spell his own name.

Bacon also encoded some "truths" in the King James version that he felt should not be eliminated, yet KJ wanted them eliminated. It was encripted by quill (but it is lost in print). Bacon, also a member in an early form of a fraternity currently known as "Freemasons" had created and mastered a particular code that only a few people in that time could decipher. It was done using a particular writing style and flare of the letters. For those outside of the fraternity, they looked like common "letters" in the alphabet. It got passed Ol' King James.

Black as coal has done his homework.

I suggest that anyone wanting to know more read a book called "The Bible Fraud."

[Missouri Mule]

Reading the "Gospel of Thomas" clinched it for me. What an eyeopener.

[Captain America]

All gospels that were contradictory to the religion desired by the early Roman Church were thought to be destroyed and all the people possessing the knowlege were either quietened or killed. (Many went underground or became "secret societies" and have passed the knowlege down through the ages but that's another talk show.)

Then in the 1940's, the Qumran scrolls and the Dead Sea scrolls were discovered. Unfortunantly for the Roman Church (Roman Catholic), during this period of time, it was not acceptable to go around killing people in the name of some god (unless your name was Hitler) to keep the "truths" hidden.

Even still, those gospels were still made up of religious gobble-de-gook and fairy tales just like the ones that did make it to print.

[The Man]

Originally posted by Captain America
All gospels that were contradictory to the religion desired by the early Roman Church were thought to be destroyed and all the people possessing the knowlege were either quietened or killed. (Many went underground or became "secret societies" and have passed the knowlege down through the ages but that's another talk show.)

Then in the 1940's, the Qumran scrolls and the Dead Sea scrolls were discovered. Unfortunantly for the Roman Church (Roman Catholic), during this period of time, it was not acceptable to go around killing people in the name of some god (unless your name was Hitler) to keep the "truths" hidden.

Even still, those gospels were still made up of religious gobble-de-gook and fairy tales just like the ones that did make it to print.

From many posts I've read, this one is going to kill Ranger!:D

[TheBrain]

Wow, how revealing. I never thought much of King James, isn't he dead?

[ranger]

Originally posted by The Man
From many posts I've read, this one is going to kill Ranger!:D

Why?

[Captain America]

In regard to the discarded gospels, from the early Roman Church, it is worth mentioning that King James also discarded some gospels from his bible of source (which was the aforementioned early Roman bible) as well.

You may notice that the Catholic bible has many more books in it than the protestant bible.

Perhaps the old saying, "If it don't fit, don't force it, just relax and let it go" applies here.:angel:

[azov]

Those "other books" are The Apocrypha, so-called because they appear in the early Greek Bibles, but the Protestant bibliophiles could not find the original Hebrew for them. Therefore they were purged from the Old Testament.

[Dante1999]

Interesting information...i would love a link to the above mentioned facts about King James.

When we talk of the bible we must remember that it has been through many translations. These translations and rewrittings were done...no matter how much the Christian world would like to think so...by man and thus imperfect in their entirety. I believe that the bible did have a pure form at one time. That pure form is now somewhat lost to us. But i tend to pray about what i read and go off what the spirit of the Lord tells me is true.

Dante