PDA

View Full Version : THIS IS SHAMFUL


DRMIZER
10-22-2003, 11:04 AM
When I was a younger man, churches were churches. There were the mainstreamers and then there were the Apostolics or "holy rollers" (that's what we called them back then).

The mainstream denominations were the usual and customary types the majority of Christians attended. The "holy rollers" were the churches where their members acted out by rolling in the isles, spoke in tongues, shouted and some even played with snakes and drank poisons. This was a simpler time when by-gones were by-gones. Everyone did their own thing without degrading the other for their beliefs.

During the last decade or so the trend has reversed itself. There has been a revival in the Evangelic-types who have broken tradition, changed the services and have excluded themselves from all the rest of the churches. They actually believe they have re-invented the wheel (religion). They are the apostolic crowd who are separated from the rest of the world and, in their own "Christian" way snub their noses at the rest of the "outsiders" who don't follow their specific dogma.

Their mantra is to be "BORN AGAIN", as though they invented the term. After all, before this generation got here, no one had ever been born again. They perch the sign of the Christian on the back of their car symbolized by a fish. On other vehicles they hail the WWJD sticker.

For the most part, I can let this rest. Their religion doesn't bother me. . . . . .until. . . . . . .During this same period of time godhucksters like Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell and the scores of other "Evangelicals" have used their stumps to solicit votes for the conservative party; the Republicans.

Pat Robertson, whose father was a Virginia Senator, whom I knew, would slap his son in the face for such vulgar lies he tells about people. . . .people who happen to be liberals. That alone makes them heathens! The great senator would turn over in his grave for the shame his son has brought to his family.

Jerry Falwell did everything possible to destroy President and Mrs. Clinton including publishing lies about Vince Foster's death. After all, the Reverend Falwell did intimate they killed him or had him killed. ALL FROM HIS PULPIT IN THE NAME OF RELIGION!

With the number of preacher freaks on television and radio, preaching hatred for liberals, it is now IMPOSSIBLE to be a born again Christian unless you are a Republican! So this is Christianity today!

It's the Conservative born agains who demand religious rights with the 10 commandments, prayer in schools, at football games, etc. You know something. . . if you would have kept your mouths shut over the years, the ACLU would never have looked at you. But, you just have to be out there, yapping away, as if the entire world was in a religious quandry!

But Apostolics, that really isn't the agenda is it? The agenda isn't about religion. The real agenda is getting our man into political office so that we Christians can rule the country the way we see it. Isn't that what you hear EVERY TIME you listen to one of your broadcast preachers?

My belief is this: The number of wars fought over religion, including the present one, has contributed to the death of more humans than any other cause. When you lie about people, stain and tarnish their lives because their ideology is different from yours simply to get your way, then you become dangerous as well. I paraphrase but it's like, "Jerry (Pat) said it, I believe it, that settles it."

Forgiveness of any kind is not in the vocabulary of the right-wing Christian fanatic, (unless under specific circumstances below). For example, when Clinton was caught with his pants down, the conservative world got on the critical bandwagon and are still on it some five years hence. We didn't pray for Mr. Clinton, that he would see the light or that he would be forgiven of his sins, or even pray for his leadership of our country. The montra was "impeach, impeach, impeach" That lying SOB should be thrown to the wolves. He has no morals, he has no soul. . . .ban him to Hades.

Ironically, now that a successful talk show host has a "prescription" problem, we wish him the best, we pray for him, we forgive him, we know how hard it must be to kick the habit and go through withdrawal. Yet, if his housekeeper didn't "out" him, he would still be doing DRUGS! Rush Limbaugh has lied, had 5 wifes, and a drug user. But that's okay, he's conservative. Shame on you.

I think I can quote Christ on this one, "You hypocrites". "Remove the log from your own eye before you try to remove the speck from your own eye."

Some of you need to go back to the basics, fall on your knees and ask forgiveness for yourselves. Some need to stop listening to the hate mongers who want to rule the world the way they see it.

You know, in the end, it's how you treated your brother on this earth. And Christians...... liberals, with all their preceived faults and beliefs are your brothers!

KWJams
10-22-2003, 01:09 PM
Sooooooo, I guess it is safe to assume that you are not fond of Rush :rolleyes:

You really need to just get out more -- go for a walk -- enjoy some quiet time and --- just get over it. ;)

NetxMan
10-22-2003, 01:43 PM
Forgiveness of any kind is not in the vocabulary of the right-wing Christian fanatic, (unless under specific circumstances below). For example, when Clinton was caught with his pants down, the conservative world got on the critical bandwagon and are still on it some five years hence. We didn't pray for Mr. Clinton, that he would see the light or that he would be forgiven of his sins, or even pray for his leadership of our country. The montra was "impeach, impeach, impeach" That lying SOB should be thrown to the wolves. He has no morals, he has no soul. . . .ban him to Hades.

You are really generalizing Christians here. First off, if Bush did the same thing, any Christian I know would say the exact, and I mean exact same thing that they did in the Clinton Case. Second, Clinton is a President. Representing our country to the rest of the world. Rush is not. Clinton isn't a man of integrity in my opinion, and lied and lied about his situation before ever admitting to it, breaking the law in the process. Rush, stood up like a man and admitted his problem, and wants to fix it. Clinton on the other hand has showed no remorse and has had this on going problem with women for a long time and hasn't tried to fix it, as far as I know.

shikaki
10-22-2003, 03:50 PM
Actually he seems to be generalizing about the “right-wing Christian fanatics”. That aside, you seem to live on a continuum of right and wrong behavior. Some types of behavior, in your opinion, is worse than other types. To me what Clinton did really goes against the grain ethically, but legally he did nothing wrong. I know many people will argue that point, but if Congress could not find anything to prosecute him on, then I too have to assume his complete legal innocence. What Rush did however was ethically wrong and legally wrong. It could be argued that Rush’s position in the country holds him at a higher level as well. I know, I know there are many of us out here that have never lied and that is why we feel obligated to make everyone accountable for their wrong doings. I really have to agree on this issue though concerning Rush. Rush is his own worst enemy, he has made judgment calls about everyone that he disagrees with and now he has been caught in his own moral, legal dilemma. Perhaps this learning experience would do him well. “Don’t judge, less thee be judged.” I think Psychologist call his behavior “projection”.

NetxMan
10-22-2003, 04:05 PM
Did I say he did anything legally wrong when it came to women? No I didn't.

But he did commit purgery. Which last time I checked was illegal. And even though no one tried him on this, I and millions of others watched it happen on tv.

Second, did rush break the law? That is yet to be decided.

The Man
10-22-2003, 05:52 PM
Clinton's lies never killed anyone. Want to talk about the current administration and WMD?

Well now, let's see about Rush. . . . . .Got one of the best attorneys money can buy. There are tapes available and in the hands of the Miami Police but. . . . . .guess you're right, Rush has NOT been proven guilty yet. . . . 'Course, OJ wasn't found guilty either!

James
10-22-2003, 10:20 PM
Back to the subject of Christians. Christianity seems to have become a "trend" with a lot of people. Kids just say they are Christians because of their parents, who said they were Christians because of their parents. Being a Christian seems to have been made just being "good" and believing that there is a God. Yet in James 2:19 (a book of the Bible) It says "You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that-and they shudder."

Although now that has created an extreme sterotype of Christians. Non-christians see the Christians (even the true ones) who hate homosexuals, and say that ALL Christians hate them. Not true! Although there is a good deal of preachers that say that they hate them, they are extremely in the wrong. The Bible tells us to love everybody.

And about the part wher DRMIZER said that everybody pointed fingers at Clintoln and yelled IMPEACH, IMPEACH! and didnt pray for him. Dont make assumptions. I have heard a lot of people pray for him that he would come to the light. Including myself.

DRMIZER
10-25-2003, 12:32 PM
James,

You're right. . . .EVERYONE doesn't do anything. I should have said many or most. This would have been more accurate.

The Man
11-05-2003, 03:36 PM
Originally posted by James
Back to the subject of Christians. Christianity seems to have become a "trend" with a lot of people.

And about the part wher DRMIZER said that everybody pointed fingers at Clintoln and yelled IMPEACH, IMPEACH! and didnt pray for him. Dont make assumptions. I have heard a lot of people pray for him that he would come to the light. Including myself.

Well, you may be right about this but literally everyone I run into daily who ARE Christians in the fundamental community certainly keep their concern for Clinton quiet. I guess they may offend others in the faith, maybe?

NetxMan
11-05-2003, 03:42 PM
Most the true Christians I knew kept their Concern quiet. I don't think offend is the right word. They wouldn't offend anyone in there own faith.

My mother and father taught me never to talk bad about the President in public, that we were to respect the office. We didn't have to hold respect of the man, but as long as he is President the office that he holds is to be respected.

Captain America
11-05-2003, 04:43 PM
On the subject of TrueChristians <trademark> might I invite one and all to visit Landover Baptist (http://www.landoverbaptist.com) church home of the TRUE christians <trademark>
:angel: :angel: :angel:

america
11-14-2003, 03:47 AM
Originally posted by DRMIZER
James,

You're right. . . .EVERYONE doesn't do anything. I should have said many or most. This would have been more accurate. or just Christianity? seems odd it is politically correct to speak so openly on Christianity yet other religions we all seem to have to walk on egg shells or are the other religions perfect?

Simon666
11-14-2003, 05:32 AM
Originally posted by NetxMan
Did I say he did anything legally wrong when it came to women? No I didn't. But he did commit purgery. Which last time I checked was illegal. And even though no one tried him on this, I and millions of others watched it happen on tv. Second, did rush break the law? That is yet to be decided.
Hey, even your big hero Ronnie Reagan lied to the American people about Iran contra, though not under oath, and repeated his lie under oath in 1990 when Bush Sr. was president. Which was last time I checked illegal too. Do you consider him a man of integrity? Yes, because you're a big hypocryt.

DRMIZER
11-14-2003, 10:46 AM
Originally posted by america
or just Christianity? seems odd it is politically correct to speak so openly on Christianity yet other religions we all seem to have to walk on egg shells or are the other religions perfect?

I don't find it a need to avoid other religions or walk on egg shells. I guess it's just that the "pew jumpers" are so rabid about certain issues as with the 10 commandments in the c ourt house that they make themselves an easy target. The wheel that squeeks the loudest gets the most grease!

gopman
11-14-2003, 10:56 AM
"Ronnie Reagan lied to the American people about Iran contra"

Reagan was never directly connected to that. It was done by members of his administration.

Missouri Mule
11-14-2003, 11:01 AM
Well, he certainly had deniability.

america
11-14-2003, 11:07 AM
Originally posted by DRMIZER
I don't find it a need to avoid other religions or walk on egg shells. I guess it's just that the "pew jumpers" are so rabid about certain issues as with the 10 commandments in the c ourt house that they make themselves an easy target. The wheel that squeeks the loudest gets the most grease!

perhaps you don't find a need to walk on egg shells with other religions because you are not saying anything critical about them as you are Christianity, try it some time and see what happens?

Rabid? Are they anymore rabid for wanting them displayed as those who do not want them displayed? The people filing suit were rather rabid.

The Christian religion states to be go out and say the gospel and not to be ashamed of religion and put it behind closed doors, some other religions state to "go into the lands and destroy their alters and false Gods."
now tell me, who do you think is winning?
hint: the judge was fired.
funny diversity only counts when it goes against Christians.
Also I might add, you HEAR more about Christians on the news, now do you think that is because they do more harm? or do you think perhaps the media might not like Christians?
or why is it in your opinion?

DRMIZER
11-14-2003, 11:23 AM
Originally posted by america
perhaps you don't find a need to walk on egg shells with other religions because you are not saying anything critical about them as you are Christianity, try it some time and see what happens?

Rabid? Are they anymore rabid for wanting them displayed as those who do not want them displayed? The people filing suit were rather rabid.

The Christian religion states to be go out and say the gospel and not to be ashamed of religion and put it behind closed doors, some other religions state to "go into the lands and destroy their alters and false Gods."
now tell me, who do you think is winning?
hint: the judge was fired.
funny diversity only counts when it goes against Christians.
Also I might add, you HEAR more about Christians on the news, now do you think that is because they do more harm? or do you think perhaps the media might not like Christians?
or why is it in your opinion?

1) I don't have a bone to pick with other religions . . .they are not in the headlines.
2) Again, why is it not enough to display your symbols of faith in your house of worship? Why do they have to be everywhere?
2a) I don't believe you are ashamed of your religion if you keep its symbols where they ought to be. What should be on the outside of the church are Christians carrying out the words they cling to for everlasting life. Show through example the love of the Christ, not to go out and piss off everyone who doesn't agree with you.
3) I do not know of any religious doctrine acceptable in this country to "go into the lands and destroy their alters and false Gods."
4) It isn't a contest between who is winning. It's the law. The judge, above all others, should know, understand and obey the law. He made his choice, so be it. He'll end up writing a book or becoming Governor and making tons of money.
5) The media picked up the story because it was reported to them, most probably by one of the pew jumpers. After all, in a case as that, the media is on YOUR side. . . .I don't believe there is a conspiracy against the church in this country. . . . . . . .at least, not yet. With our president and his open stance on Christianity?

america
11-14-2003, 12:08 PM
there is the key, do you think if Christians controlled the networks they just might show everyone elses sins rather than their own? It is human nature, they would. The question needs to be answered why they are not in the headlines?

Yes there is a religion in this country who's doctrine states to go into the lands and destroy their alters and their Gods. It is in the old testament for one.

If christians were so ungiving there would not have been America as we know it, what if we had wanted a pure Christian Country?
we would have made it so.

You have not noticed the conspiracy but that does not make it not so.

Simon666
11-14-2003, 02:13 PM
Aha, we have two people who try to find an apology for him. But if you try it for Clinton, oh no. He has to hang, what else am I going to do with this brand new rope?

america
11-15-2003, 05:45 PM
Originally posted by Simon666
Aha, we have two people who try to find an apology for him. But if you try it for Clinton, oh no. He has to hang, what else am I going to do with this brand new rope?

what two?
could I take a raincheck on the question what you should do with your rope? I might need it later:p

cpwill
11-17-2003, 02:38 AM
politically and judicially, yes, clinton committed a crime and should have been punished.

spiritually? he committed a sin just like i do on a daily basis and no doubt forgiveness is as open to him as it is to me. i, for one, hope he accepts it.

being willing and called to forgive others doesn't mean we stop punishing crime, simon;)