PDA

View Full Version : Religious Intolerance


Paladin
12-26-2003, 01:57 AM
When Blue States Attack
December 24, 2003


UTTERING the standard liberal cliche a few years ago, Richard Reeves described "representatives of the new South" as "Republicans of old puritan definition, righteous folk afraid that someone, somewhere, is having fun….” Like all beliefs universally held by liberals, Reeves' aphorism is the precise opposite of the truth.

…It's the blue states that are constantly sending lawyers to the red states to bother everyone. Americans in the red states look at a place like New York City – where, this year, the Macy's Thanksgiving Day parade featured a gay transvestite as Mrs. Claus – and say, Well, I guess some people like it, but it's not for me.

Meanwhile, liberals in New York and Washington are consumed with what people are doing in Alabama and Nebraska. Nadine Strossen and Barry Lynn cannot sleep at night knowing that someone, somewhere, is gazing upon something that could be construed as a religious symbol.
It's never Jerry Falwell flying to Manhattan to review high-school graduation speeches, or James Dobson making sure New York City schools give as much time to God as to Mother Earth, or Pat Robertson demanding a creche next to the schools' Kwanzaa displays. (Is it just me, or is Kwanzaa becoming way too commercialized?)

But when four schools in southern Ohio have displays of the Ten Commandments, sirens go off in Nadine Strossen's Upper West Side apartment…. It will surprise no one to learn that the American Civil Liberties Union promptly sued…

From the Chelsea section of Manhattan, the gay, Bronx-born Puerto Rican executive director of the ACLU, Anthony Romero, tossed and turned all night thinking about the Ten Commandments display on the Elkhart, Ind…

In Ohio, Richland County Common Pleas Judge James DeWeese had a framed poster of the Ten Commandments in his courtroom. The ACLU sued and the Ten Commandments came down. Compare that to the late New York judge Elliott Wilk, who famously displayed a portrait of communist revolutionary Che Guevara on his office wall. (Che, Castro, Hussein – evidently the only bearded revolutionary these people don't like is Jesus Christ.) And yet, no one from Ohio ever sued Wilk.

The ACLU got word of a Ten Commandments monument in a public park in Plattsmouth, Neb. (pop. 7,000), and immediately swooped in…

ACLU busybodies sued Johnson County, Iowa….

Mail-order minister Barry Lynn's Americans United for Separation of Church and State – a group curiously devoid of both Americans and churchgoers – sued little Chester County, Pa….

"The Upper West Side and Malibu United" also sued the city of Everett, Wash…

The alleged legal basis for removing all of these Ten Commandments monuments is the establishment clause of the First Amendment. That clause provides: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."

The vigilant observer will note instantly that none of the monuments cases involves Congress, a law or an establishment of religion.
Monuments are not "laws," the Plattsmouth, Neb., public park is not "Congress," and the Ten Commandments are not a religion. To the contrary, all three major religions believe in Moses and the Ten Commandments. Liberals might as well say the establishment clause prohibits Republicans from breathing, as that it prohibits a Ten Commandments display. But over the past few years, courts have ordered the removal of dozens and dozens of Ten Commandments displays.

How a local judge acknowledging a higher power with a symbol used by all three major religions is the same as Congress establishing a national religion remains a legal mystery – like, how the University of Michigan can use one admissions standard for blacks and another for whites and yet it's not race discrimination….

http://www.anncoulter.org/

treat2
01-01-2004, 04:27 PM
Yes, I watch FOX, and I think Christians are the most persecuted people in this country, more than African Americans, more than gays, and much more than Atheists!

It's time we took over the world again. (Where's my sword?)

Jray573
01-01-2004, 05:03 PM
Well, she doesn't even imply that, but she makes a lot of good points that liberals don't like to hear. Something about their allergic reaction to logic. Though her satirical attitude can be found annoying by the uninformed, or by the liberal mind. That isn't saying that they are the same thing.

treat2
01-01-2004, 07:05 PM
You would like the direct approach. Fine.

An argument that there is a vast conspiracy of Atheist Liberals
which is persecuting 99.9999% of the people in this country is utterly absurd. Only a complete idiot like the intolerant
Neo-Con Anne Coulter would feed that garbage to people without the sense to ignore her ranting.

Jray573
01-01-2004, 08:16 PM
absurd? Before I get caught in your assumed percentage of people being persecuted, you were the one to fabricate it. It actually stands somewhere around 60% and the liberal movement has managed to convince a good number of them to be embarrased by their religious beliefs.

I don't know if you are capable of an objective look at this, but the information is there, and from a lot more sources then Ann Coulter.

BTW, an intelligent mind has the ability to read anything and improve his intelligence. I have read several liberal books and learned how they are motivated. I have read several conservative books and have done the same. Just because they say it doesn't mean it's true, but it doesn't mean it's a lie either. It never hurts you to look at things objectively. In fact, it can only help you.

Sadly, liberal society has taught us that it is foolish to entertain thoughts which oppose our own. Hence, the intellectual degredation of the liberal mind.

One way to read that is to become insulted. It gives you a bad feeling because it doesn't reflect how you see yourself. Another is to question how you really look at things, and how that affects others. The second one opens you up to becoming an intellectual.

Paladin
01-02-2004, 12:07 AM
besides, no one has made THIS argument except you.

Certainly Coulter has not.

An argument that there is a vast conspiracy of Atheist Liberals
which is persecuting 99.9999% of the people in this country is utterly absurd.

What she argues, correctly i think, is

the true busy-bodies who are always sticking their noses in other peoples business, are the liberals.

the true neighborhood bullys who like to push little people around, are the liberals.

and the true Intolerants of other peoples beleifs are liberals.

bama47
01-02-2004, 04:00 PM
I'm from Alabama. I'm worried about what they are doing in New York and California. I'm sure its nothing nice.

Paladin
01-02-2004, 08:51 PM
So what have you been doing about it?

treat2
01-04-2004, 08:49 PM
Originally posted by Paladin
besides, no one has made THIS argument except you.

Certainly Coulter has not.

An argument that there is a vast conspiracy of Atheist Liberals
which is persecuting 99.9999% of the people in this country is utterly absurd.

What she argues, correctly i think, is

the true busy-bodies who are always sticking their noses in other peoples business, are the liberals.

the true neighborhood bullys who like to push little people around, are the liberals.

and the true Intolerants of other peoples beleifs are liberals.

That's not the MOST ignorant thing I've ever heard. It's the most moronic thing I've ever heard! LMMFAO!

Why do you Neo-Cons always whine and moan about being persecuted!? Take your Meds already! Your boring us!

Jray573
01-04-2004, 09:01 PM
Interesting perspective treat2, way to support your argument. I now have a broader picture of the person I aspire to be. Thank you.... so much...