PDA

View Full Version : Fire fighters nixed key water drop (Drudge)


Missouri Mule
10-31-2003, 08:27 AM
Headlined in Drudge Report. Incredible.
============

State firefighters rejected air drop request for Cedar Fire because of night regulations
J
USTIN PRITCHARD, Associated Press Writer
Thursday, October 30, 2003
©2003 Associated Press

(10-30) 23:43 PST SAN DIEGO (AP) --

The first helicopter pilot to see the patch of flames that would become the catastrophic Cedar Fire radioed for aerial water drops, but state firefighters rejected his request because it came minutes after such flights had been grounded for the night.

Within hours, the flames cascaded out of control and killed 13 residents between the mountains east of San Diego and the city. It eventually became the largest wildfire in California history.

Southern California was already besieged by flames Saturday evening when the San Diego County Sheriff's helicopter went to search for a lost hunter who allegedly lit a beacon fire.

Pilot Dave Weldon told The Associated Press on Thursday that he saw state firefighting planes on a nearby airstrip as he approached the mountains at 110 mph. He called down for help because his dispatcher had relayed reports of smoke in the area, but he got no response.

That was around 5:45 p.m. A few minutes later, he spotted smoke from the fire, then only about 50 yards on each side and not spreading.

As he steadied his helicopter against wind gusts, Weldon's concern mounted. Just before landing, he called for backup, asking another county helicopter to speed to the scene with its 120-gallon water dump bucket. And he urged the dispatcher to contact state firefighters and renew his request for air tankers.

The problem was that under state safety guidelines, no flights can go up into waning daylight. On Saturday, the cutoff was 5:36 p.m., said California Department of Forestry Capt. Ron Serabia, who coordinates the 12 tankers and 10 helicopters now battling the 272,000-acre blaze.

The sun set that day at 6:05 p.m.

The helicopter with the dump bucket flew within five miles of the fire, before state officials told it to turn back, Weldon said. The air tankers never took off. Weldon was told crews would attack the fire in the morning.

"We were basically just offering our assistance fighting their fire, and they turned it down," said Weldon, who with his partner delivered the hunter to law enforcement officials who cited him for setting an unauthorized fire. "I was frustrated about it, but I wasn't surprised."

Weldon said the county helicopter wouldn't have been allowed to drop water after dark and said that it alone couldn't have done the job, but he thought a well-placed drop from the air tanker might have extinguished the flames.

On Thursday, California's top fire official said he was not aware of the events and cited state night-flight restrictions.

"If the air tankers and helicopters cannot safely fly based on daylight, they cannot respond," said Ray Snodgrass, chief deputy director of the CDF. "We certainly don't want to kill any pilots."

The call from the county dispatcher came minutes after pilots had left the airstrip in Ramona for the night, Serabia said.

Serabia was off Saturday, but said that if word had arrived sooner, a plane could have dropped 3,200 gallons of chemical retardant within eight minutes. What's more, pilots might have slipped in a second flight because once a plane is engaged, it can fly up to 30 minutes after cutoff.

"The aircraft would have been able to suppress the fire, or at least hold it in check," Serabia said.

Still, he said hindsight was pointless.

"It's easy to say 'What if we did this,' or 'What if we did that,"' said Serabia, a 35-year veteran firefighter. "I'm not going to second-guess it. That's what we have to live with -- what happened, what transpired from that point after cutoff."

The rules may help save pilots, but they were cold comfort to the son of one man who died hours after the county helicopter was called off.

Stephen Shacklett was killed shortly after 3 a.m. Sunday when he tried to race away from the flames in his motor home.

Told of Saturday evening's events in the air, his son was incredulous on Thursday.

"The hugest fire in California history," said Stephen Shacklett Jr., "and they had a chance to put it out."

Associated Press Writers Kim Curtis and Elliot Spagat contributed to this report.

©2003 Associated Press

URL: sfgate.com/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2003/10/30/state0152EST7678.DTL

Missouri Mule
10-31-2003, 08:32 AM
To think they could have prevented all of this horrible damage and loss of life.

http://www.nbc4.tv/news/2583516/detail.html

marie
11-04-2003, 04:55 PM
I also understand that the Governor had requested funds from FEMA and had personally written a letter to Bush regarding the dire need to remove the old brush. I do not know and I'm sure we'll never know if this would have helped, but it is also something to think about. :(

Missouri Mule
11-04-2003, 05:39 PM
Oh, it would undoubtedly have helped. I'm taking down two pine trees on my yard. Been dead for about two months. The dead wood was already evident and the pine needles will go up like you wouldn't believe. Deciduous trees are not like this. The pines and cedar trees are absolute fire hazards if they are dead or dying. Mature trees without the fuel nearby are relatively protected with their thick bark. This is known as a "cool burn" as opposed to the out of control fires experienced in California.

It is one thing to not want to cut down mature or "old growth" trees. It is quite another to allow brush to accumulate. It is a disaster in the making. I've been in some fires and believe me it is an experience I would not want to repeat.

Captain America
11-04-2003, 08:24 PM
B-dog, was it you who said hindsite is 20/20?

We owe a debt of gratitude to our nations firefighters. They ALWAYS do the very best they can.

Missouri Mule
11-04-2003, 11:00 PM
I agree. It's too bad that the environmentalists in their zeal have compounded the problem by opposing the clearing of brush. I'm sure that you know what I am talking about with respect to these pine trees. They are the worst possible source of fuel for a forest fire.

Simon666
11-08-2003, 04:27 PM
Maybe you need the Il 76 waterbomber? :D:p

Missouri Mule
11-08-2003, 10:04 PM
Certainly that would be a good thing after the fact. However, the fires wouldn't have been a problem if the land had been kept clear of brush. This happened in Yellowstone and I saw it coming in 1974 when we visited there. In 1989 the worst possible dreams came to fruition. Quite unnecessary.

marie
11-08-2003, 10:10 PM
Originally posted by Missouri Mule
Certainly that would be a good thing after the fact. However, the fires wouldn't have been a problem if the land had been kept clear of brush. This happened in Yellowstone and I saw it coming in 1974 when we visited there. In 1989 the worst possible dreams came to fruition. Quite unnecessary.

Of course I've heard that the fires were "human error" and arson. :( We went through this in Washington this summer. Everyday there was a brushfire next to the highway. Why can't people just use their ashtrays :confused:

Missouri Mule
11-08-2003, 10:30 PM
Fire can actually be quite beneficial and useful to the soil. The policy of no burns and no clearing of brush surely is beginning to be seen a wrong policy. Fires are going to happen whether natural (lighting strikes, etc.) or manmade. What we have to do is to have sensible policies.