PDA

View Full Version : The Evolution problem has been solved


mugawump
11-09-2005, 12:16 PM
It has all been proved,and was reported on TV this morning. (and you can check it out yourself) It seems that the announcer had visited a McDonalds, and ordered a Egg McMuffin and some chicken strips. "THE EGG CAME FIRST"

Strel
11-09-2005, 12:17 PM
It has all been proved,and was reported on TV this morning. (and you can check it out yourself) It seems that the announcer had visited a McDonalds, and ordered a Egg McMuffin and some chicken strips. "THE EGG CAME FIRST"


And he would be right. The "egg" did come first.

Craig
11-09-2005, 02:32 PM
I concur.

mugawump
11-09-2005, 02:39 PM
Actually it was a joke, but in reality, we are all in agreement

Duo_Maxwell
11-09-2005, 03:37 PM
I concur.

Well, not the Chicken as we know it.

More of the forest red/green/blue/black fowl of Asia.

Russikan
11-09-2005, 07:05 PM
Well Fish lay eggs. Far before anything close to a chicken.

But the evolution problem has been solved in Dover at least. With the election of 8 new school board members.

meloakey
11-10-2005, 10:30 PM
Not that I am agreeing with Christians but how did the egg get there? The chicken that layed it. But then how did the first chicken or egg come about? Which came first?

Art of War
11-11-2005, 04:32 AM
The egg was laid by another animal similar to the chicken and through thousands of years of change another animal came out of that egg.

You ever see that weekend update that explained this?
In Thailand a chicken and a rooster took part in a mass wedding ceremony and for the record on the wedding night the chicken came first....

Russikan
11-11-2005, 05:51 PM
Not that I am agreeing with Christians but how did the egg get there? The chicken that layed it. But then how did the first chicken or egg come about? Which came first?

The egg came first because eggs are layed by thousands and millions of species. (thousands I like and millions of icky insects I don't) and most of these species and their precursers existed long before chickens.

RobinD69
11-12-2005, 11:39 PM
The egg came first because eggs are layed by thousands and millions of species. (thousands I like and millions of icky insects I don't) and most of these species and their precursers existed long before chickens.
Good theory,but lacking in proof.

dittohead not!
11-12-2005, 11:44 PM
And God saw that the Earth was devoid of eggs and chickens, and said, "Let there be eggs.... no, chickens..... no..."
Meanwhile, fish (that had been laying eggs all along) developed legs and evolved into other creatures, that eventually evolved into chickens, and began laying eggs.

So, the chicken came first.

RobinD69
11-12-2005, 11:49 PM
And God saw that the Earth was devoid of eggs and chickens, and said, "Let there be eggs.... no, chickens..... no..."
Meanwhile, fish (that had been laying eggs all along) developed legs and evolved into other creatures, that eventually evolved into chickens, and began laying eggs.

So, the chicken came first.
Actually it also said the earth was devoid of life,and that means fish who could develope legs as well.
Where are the fossils that would connect fish to chickens?or fish to humans?or fish to birds?
I am just curious.

dittohead not!
11-12-2005, 11:52 PM
Actually it also said the earth was devoid of life,and that means fish who could develope legs as well.
Where are the fossils that would connect fish to chickens?or fish to humans?or fish to birds?
I am just curious.

God created them, too, of course, then buried them in different strata for future paleontologists to dig up. If you don't believe me, just ask a fundamentalist Christian who believes that the Bible is 100% accurate and must be taken literally.

RobinD69
11-13-2005, 12:03 AM
God created them, too, of course, then buried them in different strata for future paleontologists to dig up. If you don't believe me, just ask a fundamentalist Christian who believes that the Bible is 100% accurate and must be taken literally.
Well that may be the case if they are ever found,since I decided to ask myself since I pretty much fit the bill as a fundamentalist.Thank you for the compliment.

dittohead not!
11-13-2005, 12:14 AM
Well that may be the case if they are ever found,since I decided to ask myself since I pretty much fit the bill as a fundamentalist.Thank you for the compliment.

God was pretty creative in burying dinosaur fossils with feathers for us to find and conclude that forerunners to modern birds may have existed over 60 milion years ago. Of course, the Bible tells us that the Earth isn't that old, so that had to have been some kind of divine joke.

Or did Satan put the fossils there just to fool us? :eek:

RobinD69
11-13-2005, 12:41 AM
God was pretty creative in burying dinosaur fossils with feathers for us to find and conclude that forerunners to modern birds may have existed over 60 milion years ago. Of course, the Bible tells us that the Earth isn't that old, so that had to have been some kind of divine joke.

Or did Satan put the fossils there just to fool us? :eek:
Actually if you properly investigate the creationalists perspective it will explain the fossil record along with the Biblical record.

dittohead not!
11-13-2005, 12:54 AM
Actually if you properly investigate the creationalists perspective it will explain the fossil record along with the Biblical record.

Is their explaination similar to mine?

I remember reading a very creative cartoon series that depicted a dinosaur as the "serpent" in the Garden of Eden."

NiteGuy
11-13-2005, 01:47 AM
Actually it also said the earth was devoid of life,and that means fish who could develope legs as well.
Where are the fossils that would connect fish to chickens?or fish to humans?or fish to birds?
I am just curious.

Actually you can trace the fossil record from the first fishes found right on up to modern day humans. The skulls, for instance, contain the same number of bones, and you can follow the transformation of those bones from fish, through amphibians, through the first small mammals, through larger mammals, and through the primates right on up to us. Isn't proof of evolution marvelous?

Russikan
11-13-2005, 01:54 AM
Good theory,but lacking in proof.

Except the clear evidence that life started in the Ocean. And that live birth is rare in early complex oraganisms.

But don't worry, 19 posts is more than enough for me to know already that you don't accept knowledge unless it already conforms to your belief system.