PDA

View Full Version : theory of infinite smallness


Senor Herberto
12-06-2005, 04:50 AM
if you measure...

...the electromagnetic signature of any spherical group of objects, the signature will become uniform at a certain rAdius because every point of magnetism extends dwindlingly in all directions.

when the group's individual magnetic signatures become similar enough to one another to "entrain"* into a uniform magnetic blob they have become a 'universal particle'. from the exterior, this particle seems to have a single EM charge, and behaves as a solid particle, held in place and together by its own magnetism, while forces inside may move more freely or even slightly change their charges.

[*entrainment is when two frequencies become like one another, because overlapping at such close Hz proximity is difficult]

although special attention is paid to the important shift between atomic and sub-atomic realms, this universal particle can be of any size. there is no limit to the tinyness or the hugeness of such particles, because each is magnetically relevant to itself.

this closed set of magnets causes the laws of physics to be applied at their select atomic scale, as well as causing time to move at its relative rate, explaining how sub-atomic particles behave in vastly different ways but on a similar theme to traditional concentric circles and patterns of our relative size area.

this can create worlds within worlds. it applies in the universal entrainment of particles, as a massive hologram reflecting like itself.

these tiny worlds/particles, which are, according to this theory, entirely 100% electromagnetic waves and fields, 'matter free', behave basically as they choose to by the laws of electromagnetics.

furthermore, because the living human's brain is an originating electromagnetic device, able to [seemingly] create or modify EM charges and fields by force of will and consciousness alone, resulting in entrainment and affecting [minutely] every bit of every existing thing instantly by magnet, that human thought and -divine will- alone can 'create worlds' originally, although the origin of existance is from the Creator, the Heavenly Father, God, and god maintains supreme command over His creation. Because He loves you, creations, He has given you free will, but also because He loves you, He will not force you to love Him in return, nor one another.

Thus evil is created in the hearts [and minds] of men. and women.

furthermore, the tinier particles may be holograms of the current universe, and may lead the way for our own universe to unfold through time. the tiny particles move via relativity at trillions of years per one of our grand seconds, and can chart all relative history and existance in about an instant. furthermore, they are as numerous as atoms in reality, and can conceivably cover every possibility and each single 'chance' or 'decision' ever made by any human during the course of their entire life throughout the history of life. which path to take is decided by EM entrainment to that tiny reality, and entrainment in that time-direction can change mid-path if EM values shift. hence, "sticky magnetic fate".

Herberto's Theory of Infinite Smallness ^---<<

[b]Quantum Entanglement Theory \/--<<

A quantum particle is a subatomic particle. Quantum entanglement is when two distant particles become associated with one another in a 'strange' way. We do not understand how, but we have witnessed the effects of it.

When one such entangled particle is moved, it's entangled twin is moved in the same way.

For example, if i entrained two basball bats, i could simultaneously hit home runs in Chicago and L.A.

--
I also speculate that particles can be double-entangled. This way both particles may act irrationally for basically no good reason. Perhaps if we understand the principles of entanglement more clearly, two particles may move in unison without apparent cause.

==

these principles play special roles in social dynamics. social dynamics are affected specially by electromagnetic sensations.

each thought is an electromagnetic event.

Nuke the Oil
12-06-2005, 12:20 PM
Sorry if I seem to be picking on you Senor, but I've done a degree in physics and can't leave this alone!

First of all as far as we can determine the universe is not scalable, meaning that the physics of say the electromagnetic interactions of atoms and the electromagnetic interactions of metallic balls are only approximately equal. I will assume that when you write entrain, you actually mean entangle, at first glance they appear to be close to equivalent in some respects, but they are very different. Only quantum scale systems have any possibility of measurable entanglement because the measureable variables of the system approach the scale of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. The mechanism of entanglement works off the uncertainty principle as in the following example:

First entangle two particles, an example would be a radioactive decay resulting (for simplicity's sake) in two particles of equal mass and opposite momentum (this comes from conservation of momentum). Now Heisenberg's principle forbids us (in this example) from knowing both the position and momentum of a particle to an arbitrarily good accuracy. But let's try to be sneaky buggers, we know the momentum of one particle is the opposite of the other, so lets measure the momentum of one particle and the position of the other. Then we might think we can defeat Heisenberg's principle, but when we measure the momentum of one particle we find the uncertainty in the position of BOTH particles has increased in order to foil our cunning scheme. This, simply put, is entanglement. This is not trivial, and is at the core of the weirdness of quantum physics. Einstein could not accept the implications of this, and spent many of the rest of his days struggling to come up with an alternative. However, experimentation backs this view strongly.

This can not be scaled up to macroscopic systems because Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is insignificant in size at such scales. Futhermore the uncertainty principle forbids the structure necessary for particles to be tiny universes or the like. It should also be noted that electromagnetic force only serves to keep electrons around protons, the nucleus is held together by weak and strong nuclear forces. Also I must say I detest "the universe is a hologram" idea, I think it originates from one of those popular science books, and I am so sick of people bringing it up!

There is an interpretation of quantum physics (not widely accepted, but not discredited) that fits your idea of every possibility in the universe existing much better - the Everett or many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. By this view all possibilities actually do exist, and quantum effects are the result of interference between the different "worlds".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation

The brain is a complex electrochemical system, and we do not have enough information to intelligently guess whether quantum effects are involved. And I would warn you off applying quantum mechanics to society - they are two incredibly disparate fields.

USViking
12-06-2005, 01:59 PM
Isn't smallness limited by Planck's Constant?-
all energy appears to consist of integer mutiples
of this very small amount, and even massless
particles are thought to have energy.

Russikan
12-06-2005, 07:48 PM
that human thought and -divine will- alone can 'create worlds' originally, although the origin of existance is from the Creator, the Heavenly Father, God, and god maintains supreme command over His creation. Because He loves you, creations, He has given you free will, but also because He loves you, He will not force you to love Him in return, nor one another.

Thus evil is created in the hearts [and minds] of men. and women.

Couldn't manage an entire post without preaching?

Nuke the Oil
12-06-2005, 08:21 PM
Isn't smallness limited by Planck's Constant?-
all energy appears to consist of integer mutiples
of this very small amount, and even massless
particles are thought to have energy.

Sort of, the length and time scales on which quantum effects dominate is called the planck length and planck time respectively. Of course this cut off point is sort of arbitrary (we can't directly quantize space in a general relativistic regime, well actually it can be done, but the results do not correspond with reality) so we can roughly say that finer "detail" than this does not exist. The numbers are here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length

You can see that if we can measure position to this level of precision then the uncertainty in the momentum must be huge, macroscopic in fact.

mataj
12-07-2005, 03:41 AM
Couldn't manage an entire post without preaching?It was meant as preaching. A preaching, decorated with Quantum Mechanics.