PDA

View Full Version : English study says fish have no health benefits


Chauncey
03-24-2006, 12:24 AM
No evidence oily fish have health benefits, study finds

By Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor
Published: 24 March 2006

For at least 20 years doctors have been urging their patients to eat more oily fish to benefit the heart. Adding two servings a week of mackerel, salmon and similar fish to the family shopping list was believed to help fend off cardiovascular disease.

Now a major new study suggests the advice was wrong. Scientists who reviewed no fewer than 89 studies of omega 3 fats, the key constituent of fish oils thought to protect against heart disease, found no clear evidence that they are of any use at all.

Researchers from the University of East Anglia and eight other institutions say that when the results were pooled they showed no strong evidence that omega 3 fats had an effect on overall deaths, heart disease, stroke or cancer.

The finding, if confirmed, will place fish oils at the top of the list of medical shibboleths that turned out to be myths. Among them are claims that fibre can prevent bowel cancer, vitamin C can halt colds, spinal manipulation can cure back pain, tranquillisers can cure anxiety and removing tonsils can prevent throat infections.

All have held sway, in some cases for decades, leading patients to treat themselves or seek treatment that turned out to be worthless.

Sales of fish oil capsules have soared on the back of the advice - for the millions who find oily fish unpalatable. Eggs high in omega 3 fats and margarine enriched with them have appeared on the market in recent years, in response to consumer demand.

The health value of these products is now in doubt. Yesterday the British Heart Foundation responded to the unexpected result by calling for more research. The Health Supplements Information Service, representing manufacturers of fish oil capsules, suggested omega 3 fats might affect different people differently. Only further studies could supply the answer, it said.

For their review of omega 3 research, the scientists from the University of East Anglia selected studies that involved a treatment group and a control group, and had investigated the effect of consuming extra omega 3 fats on health for at least six months. Differences in the quality of the studies were taken into account to minimise bias. In 48 of the trials, the omega 3 fats were taken in the form of dietary supplements such as capsules.

Until three years ago, cumulative evidence showed a benefit from omega 3 fats, but a major study called the DART-2 trial published in 2003 changed the overall picture. It included more than 3,000 men and showed a higher heart death rate in those taking fish oil capsules.

Many consumers take fish oil capsules, which are enriched with vitamins A, D and E, for their joints, skin and hair, but the study did not examine their effect on these.

The potential of omega 3 fats taken as supplements for preventing memory loss and dementia in elderly people is currently being tested, with results due in 2008.

In addition to oily fish, which contain long chain omega 3 fats, shorter chain omega 3 fats found in some plant oils are also thought to be good for health. But the review found no effect of either kind.

The findings, by researchers from the School of Medicine at the University of East Anglia, are published in the online edition of the British Medical Journal today.

[snip]

Entire Article (http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/health_medical/article353286.ece)

Very interesting, I wonder what future studies will show.

The_Penguin
03-24-2006, 01:06 AM
No evidence oily fish have health benefits, study finds

By Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor
Published: 24 March 2006



Entire Article (http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/health_medical/article353286.ece)

Very interesting, I wonder what future studies will show.
Meh... I've started to distrust studies that focus in on health. Every year there is one study that says that drinking coffee is beneficial to your health, while another one says that it's harmful.

If I were to make a prediction, I'd bet that there will be future studies that attempt to disprove this one.

nogoodname90
03-24-2006, 07:27 AM
How can this be, then whats the secret to asians being so smart?:D just kidding but I dont belive this at all.

::Major_Baker::
03-24-2006, 10:35 AM
How can this be, then whats the secret to asians being so smart?:D just kidding but I dont belive this at all.

It's called hard work and disicipline....
and no, it doesn't fall in the time slot between "American Idol" and "who wants to have sex with my mom" :lol:

Dangerrmouse
03-24-2006, 01:41 PM
Fish have no health benefits? Does that mean they have to sink or swim?

Confucius
03-25-2006, 11:29 PM
Bah! I dont care, not everything i eat has to be healthy, as long as it tastes good, and it fills my stomach, I dont care what it is.

Craig
03-26-2006, 12:29 AM
spinal manipulation can cure back pain

On the main subject of this article, I don't recall hearing anyone say that one should eat fish to help prevent cardiovascular disease. Rather, I'd heard people recommend that you eat fish because they have much less of the "bad fats" than other meats, and because Omega 3 is good "brain food" that helps you think.

Now for the quote. It suggests that spinal manipulations (presumably chioropractory) cannot cure back pain. But this is disingenuous; chiropractors don't claim that adjustments will permanently cure back pain, but they certainly can alleviate it, and barring other problems, if one takes good care of one's back and regularly goes in for adjustments, one need not suffer from back pain. Insofar that chiropractic adjustments can very much help with back pain, this articlei is deceiving. So I have to wonder about the other "myths" and "false claims" made in it.

Pulcinella
04-05-2006, 05:32 AM
But if you read the actual paper, the conclusions drawn were from meta-analysis of a number of small and a few large trials. If the latest large trial (Burr et al, Eur J Clin Nutr 2003) is excluded, the effect of fish oils is positive (slightly). The Burr et al trial looked at men with angina, other trials looked at other or combined heart problems, and it seems that fish oil may be beneficial for those at risk of a heart attack. Though not angina.

Moral of the story: Pick your heart disease carefully if you like fish.