PDA

View Full Version : Countries under Islamic law still practice abrogation and Dhimmitude


Your_Embryo
07-24-2006, 08:54 PM
These are some of the hotbeds of Dhimmitude. They are considered hotbeds because of the acts of abrogation that are being forced in these areas. Other areas under Islamic law tend to utilize the same practices of subjegation.

DHIMMI HOTSPOTS:
Pakistan: anti-Christian legislation
Iran: Systematic oppression of the Bahai community
Sudan: Murder and enslavement of Black Africans
Saudi Arabia: Apartheid for all non-Muslims
Indonesia: Terrorizing of Christian minorities
Egypt: Oppression of Coptic Christians
Bangladesh: Terrorizing of Hindu and Christian minorities by Islamic radicals

DHIMMI: A BRIEF OVERVIEW
7th-21st century. The notion of Dhimmitude, originating in the 7th century, still applies today to non-Muslims under Islamic rule—whether Jews or Christians, whether in Saudi Arabia or in Sudan. Dhimmitude began in 628 CE when Mohammed and his forces conquered the Jewish oasis at Khaybar. They massacred many of the Jews and forced the rest to accept a pact ("Dhimma") which rendered them inferiror to their Muslim conquerors. Over the centuries, the ideology of Dhimmitude expanded into a formal system of religious apartheid.

Institutionalized apartheid. In Shari’a law, there are official discriminations against the Dhimmi, such as the poll-tax or jizya.

No legal rights. Jews may not testify in court against a Muslim and have no legal right to dispute or challenge anything done to them by Muslims. There is no such thing as a Muslim raping a Jewish woman; there is no such thing as a Muslim murdering a Jew (at most, it can be manslaughter). In contrast, a Jew who strikes a Muslim is killed.

Humiliation and vulnerability. Jews and Christians had to walk around with badges or veils identifying them as Jews or Christians. The yellow star that Jews had wear in Nazi Germany did not originate in Europe. It was borrowed from the Muslim world where it was part of the apartheid system of Dhimmitude.

Conditional protection. The protection of the Dhimmi is withdrawn if the Dhimmi rebels against Islamic law, gives allegiance to non-Muslim power (such as Israel), refuses to pay the poll-tax, entices a Muslim from his faith, or harms a Muslim or his property. If the protection is lifted, jihad resumes. For example, Islamists in Egypt who pillage and kill the Copts do so because they no longer pay their poll-tax and therefore are no longer protected.

http://www.dhimmi.com/dhimmi_overview.htm



The doctrine of abrogation is not the province of long dead muftis whose works no longer carry any weight in the Islamic world. The Saudi Sheikh Muhammad Saalih al-Munajid(b. 1962), whose lectures and Islamic rulings (fatawa) circulate widely throught the Islamic world, demonstrates this in a discussion of whether Muslims should force others to accept Islam. In considering Qur'an 2:256("There is no compulsion in religion") the sheik quotes Qur'an 9:29, 8:39, "And fight them until there is no more Fitnah(disbelief and polytheism, ie worshipping others besides Allah), and the religion (worship) will be for Allah alone "[in the whole of the world]", and the Verse of the Sword. Of the latter, Sheikh Muhammad says simply:"This verse is known as Ayat al-Sayf(the verse of the Sword). These and similar verses abrogate those saying that there is no cumpulsion to become Muslim.

The PIG (Politically Incorrect Guide) to Islam (and the Crusades), pg. 27

h12
07-25-2006, 09:12 PM
what happen on palestine from jews , is'nt that
a racialist?!

Your_Embryo
07-25-2006, 09:22 PM
what happen on palestine from jews , is'nt that
a racialist?!


What happened smart guy? <<MOD EDIT: Offensive generalizations are against the forum rules>>