PDA

View Full Version : Hung Over in the End Times


serenity
07-29-2006, 06:27 PM
"At the same time, the faithful presume themselves to be aggrieved holy victims, every last damned one of them. And when you are a victim, whether it be of the removal of the Ten Commandments from your white cracker court house by onanist liberal heathens "frum up nawth," or the refusal of the Great Satan Kansas School board to add humus and sheep’s eyes to the school lunch program, you are entitled to revenge in the form of taking down the entire world. What the hell? God is gonna do it anyway at the end time, which anybody who reads the Good Book knows is any day now."




"As the elections proved for once and for all, Christian fanatics are plenty thick in the good ole U S of A these days and can no longer be written off as Dogpatch religionists. Historically, they have always been around and in about the same numbers too, just less visible. But currently they are hopped up about god giving them their own president and even their own political party. Of course in a country limited to two parties -- the Republican Party of Heavy Imperialism and Democratic Imperialism Lite -- this spells trouble for those of us who do not handle snakes or wash other people’s feet during church services. It is one thing for them to have it in for their enemies, and quite another to have their own president, cabinet, Supreme Court, and newly established Department of Fatherland Surveillance backing them up. "

snip

"Meanwhile, it's hard to tell who is controlling whom. Do the Christian Fundamentalists in this country now have significant control of the Republican Party? Or were they simply duped into backing the latest U.S. capitalist imperialist grab for empire and exploitation of ordinary working Americans. My guess is that the big Republican capitalists do not give a ****, so long as they can grab the money and run when the lights are shot out, and that the Christians don’t care as long as they get a shot at swapping the Constitution with the Bible."



http://www.joebageant.com/joe/2004/11/hung_over_in_th.html

neo of the mind
07-29-2006, 07:49 PM
....and the point of his article and your post is what?

serenity
07-29-2006, 07:55 PM
....and the point of his article and your post is what?


So...am I to presume you take some issue with certain parts of his piece? :)

neo of the mind
07-30-2006, 01:58 AM
I'm trying to understand if he actually had a point to his article or if it was just ranting and complaining along with sterotypical exaggerations.

So unless you can cite a purpose other than the latter, then the latter is what I got out of it.

serenity
08-01-2006, 12:57 PM
I'm trying to understand if he actually had a point to his article or if it was just ranting and complaining along with sterotypical exaggerations.

So unless you can cite a purpose other than the latter, then the latter is what I got out of it.


The point of the article, as you'd know if you'd read it (so making your question irrelevant) is that the Fundamentalist, far-Right Christians are a pitiable bunch; further, the author was one of them, and got out.

I mean, what did you think it was about? Is anything that critiques Christian fundamentalism automatically bad?