Readers Keep Fleeing Biased L.A. Times

[NetxMan]

Thursday, Oct. 9, 2003
Readers Keep Fleeing Biased L.A. Times

Bias on the news pages of a paper is not only unethical and immoral, it's expensive. Just ask the hacks at the Democrat house organ known as the Los Angeles Times.

People are continuing to cancel subscriptions, embattled Times editor John Carroll admitted to the San Francisco Chronicle. He wouldn't give new numbers, but days ago the Times acknowledged a thousand cancellations.



Full Story (http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2003/10/9/113156.shtml)

Do you think people are finally coming around?

[up2date]

I don't regularly read the L.A. Times, so I can't intelligently comment on its bias. If it is biased towards the left, it wouldn't be the first time. But as I said in another thread, the liberals don't have a monopoly on this. Unfortunately this is a political trait and not just a liberal one.

[NetxMan]

They major media outlets, do have a major bias. This is unfair to the public.

[MrZero]

I live in Orange County and long ago gave up the LA Times for the Orange County Register which I have found to have little to no political slant in their reporting. I have found it quite amusing that LA Times subscribers are jumping ship in droves because of their blatant leanings toward the left and thier unabated attempts to force liberalism down the throats of thier readers.

Perhaps this will send a message that we as consumers are tired of being spoon fed political spin and news outlets will once again start reporting on just the facts.

[Socrates]

I agree. I don't particullarly care to hear an outlets opinion on what happened, I just need to know exactly what occured and the incidents surrounding it. LA Times: Keep your left wing bias to yourself.