PDA

View Full Version : Freedom is lost one bit at a time


Ethos
09-19-2007, 02:15 PM
Imagine this: in 1776, the Founders of our country concluded that the most important means of communication—at that time the printing press—was so vital to the economic and political development of America that they decided to issue, along with the Declaration of Independence, a national office of printing presses that would supplant the existing free presses of the day.

Any free rational individual at the time would have risen up in opposition, justifiably accusing the founders of hypocrisy, and of setting up the conditions of tyranny by using a government-subsidized press to squeeze out the free and open media of the day. The revolutionaries would have first turned on their leaders, before taking on the British Redcoats.

Not possible, you say, in America? Think again.

Municipalities across the country are setting up municipal wireless, cable, internet, and telephone systems to directly compete with those operating in the free market today. Already most cities “franchise” cable companies to provide exclusive cable access to homes within their jurisdictions, and were it not for off-air and satellite companies there would be no competition for your cable TV already. And in exchange for those franchises, municipalities routinely demand concessions such as cable-access channels, broadcast of municipal TV shows, and even sometimes outright bribes such as upgrading city streetscapes or other such nonsense.

In short, governments already have too much control over the means of communication.

The new trend, though, is to get into the business of communications services themselves. Several cities have set up municipal wireless systems—which have been largely huge financial failures—and now some are getting into the “fiber optic to the home” business.

These government-run, government-owned, or even government-licensed services are not just financially stupid, but in fact a direct threat to our liberties. Just as government-owned, government-subsidized, or government chartered newspapers would have appalled our founding fathers, the idea of giving over control to the government the most important means of communication in present-day America—telephones and internet access especially—should be repugnant to all who cherish liberty.



http://www.townhall.com/columnists/DavidStrom/2007/09/18/freedom_is_lost_one_bit_at_a_time

ptac4x4
09-19-2007, 05:17 PM
So internet access at libraries should be commercialized? The government should contract out the publication of information the public wants made avaialble throught the internet (forms, licenses, crime data, etc)?

Many towns that provide wireless access to the public do so through contracts with private companies. Many libraries, town hall, federal agencies do have their own hardware (servers) to support public access e-govt. So I am not sure that I agree that today what the local/state/fed goverment is doing as far as the internet is a threat. I would need more specific examples where the government is controlling the internet or taking over the news media.

Ethos
09-19-2007, 05:53 PM
So internet access at libraries should be commercialized? The government should contract out the publication of information the public wants made avaialble throught the internet (forms, licenses, crime data, etc)?

Many towns that provide wireless access to the public do so through contracts with private companies. Many libraries, town hall, federal agencies do have their own hardware (servers) to support public access e-govt. So I am not sure that I agree that today what the local/state/fed goverment is doing as far as the internet is a threat. I would need more specific examples where the government is controlling the internet or taking over the news media.

There is a difference between providing internet access in a public library and establishing municipal wireless servers for mass public consumption.

Specific examples are fine, but I would think that once we get to the point where the government does have too much control over our media, objecting to the progression is far too late.

Ethos

ptac4x4
09-19-2007, 06:10 PM
From what I have seen in Arizona, the municipal wireless severs for a town are done through town/city contracts. The city does not own the equipment, provide maintance, etc.

I agree if the government controlled and managed all communications systems in a country this would not be tolerated. I just don't see this happening now. The government systems / servers that I was use to when I was working was more internal - intra net and servers to connect out to the world. The agency I worked for did not control the internet. It did have equipment / servers to provide public access to information via the internet.

Ethos
09-19-2007, 06:12 PM
Apparently you maintain a larger degree of trust in the government than I do. Do note the article's title is apt - the threat is not instant, but one step forward at a time. Honestly I hope you are correct.

Ethos