PDA

View Full Version : Whacked Out Assoc. Professor Risks Lives of Others


rjamortega
08-08-2008, 04:35 PM
What on earth could be Assoc Prof Denise Spellberg's motives?!?!
Starting in 2002, Spokane, Wash., journalist Sherry Jones toiled weekends on a racy historical novel about Aisha, the young wife of the prophet Muhammad. Ms. Jones learned Arabic, studied scholarly works about Aisha's life, and came to admire her protagonist as a woman of courage. When Random House bought her novel last year in a $100,000, two-book deal, she was ecstatic. This past spring, she began plans for an eight-city book tour after the Aug. 12 publication date of "The Jewel of Medina" -- a tale of lust, love and intrigue in the prophet's harem.

It's not going to happen: In May, Random House abruptly called off publication of the book. The series of events that torpedoed this novel are a window into how quickly fear stunts intelligent discourse about the Muslim world.

...

After consulting security experts and Islam scholars, Mr. Perry said the company decided "to postpone publication for the safety of the author, employees of Random House, booksellers and anyone else who would be involved in distribution and sale of the novel."

This saga upsets me as a Muslim -- and as a writer who believes that fiction can bring Islamic history to life in a uniquely captivating and humanizing way. "I'm devastated," Ms. Jones told me after the book got spiked, adding, "I wanted to honor Aisha and all the wives of Muhammad by giving voice to them, remarkable women whose crucial roles in the shaping of Islam have so often been ignored -- silenced -- by historians." Last month, Ms. Jones signed a termination agreement with Random House, so her literary agent could shop the book to other publishers.

This time, the instigator of the trouble wasn't a radical Muslim cleric, but an American academic. In April, looking for endorsements, Random House sent galleys to writers and scholars, including Denise Spellberg, an associate professor of Islamic history at the University of Texas in Austin. Ms. Jones put her on the list because she read Ms. Spellberg's book, "Politics, Gender, and the Islamic Past: The Legacy of 'A'isha Bint Abi Bakr."

But Ms. Spellberg wasn't a fan of Ms. Jones's book. On April 30, Shahed Amanullah, a guest lecturer in Ms. Spellberg's classes and the editor of a popular Muslim Web site, got a frantic call from her. "She was upset," Mr. Amanullah recalls. He says Ms. Spellberg told him the novel "made fun of Muslims and their history," and asked him to warn Muslims.

In an interview, Ms. Spellberg told me the novel is a "very ugly, stupid piece of work." The novel, for example, includes a scene on the night when Muhammad consummated his marriage with Aisha: "the pain of consummation soon melted away. Muhammad was so gentle. I hardly felt the scorpion's sting. To be in his arms, skin to skin, was the bliss I had longed for all my life." Says Ms. Spellberg: "I walked through a metal detector to see 'Last Temptation of Christ,'" the controversial 1980s film adaptation of a novel that depicted a relationship between Jesus and Mary Magdalene. "I don't have a problem with historical fiction. I do have a problem with the deliberate misinterpretation of history. You can't play with a sacred history and turn it into soft core pornography."
...
(cont)
http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB121797979078815073.html

I'm sure a university professor ought to know what kind of trouble she could be stewing up?

On a side note, I like how Spellberg descerns between "historical fiction" and "deliberate misinterpretation of history" between Jesus and the Prophet - peace be to him, god willin' and the crick don't rise.:D

Groucho
08-08-2008, 05:48 PM
You're blaming the professor instead of the intolerant Mulsims who think their religion requires them to bring violence on anyone who disagrees with them?

I know which side I'm on.

rjamortega
08-08-2008, 06:00 PM
As I understand the article, she made sure various muslim groups were made aware of the book. Seems like a dangerous thing to do given all the examples we have of muslims easily becoming incensed over western depictions of the Prophet - peace be with him, god willin' and the crick don't rise.

Atticus
08-08-2008, 11:05 PM
Someone told a bunch of people about a novel? And provided an opinion as to its quality and the message contained in it? Horrors! I'm sure Random House would rather that no one know about the thing once they've printed up 50,000 copies.

serenity
08-11-2008, 10:11 AM
This saga upsets me as a Muslim -- and as a writer who believes that fiction can bring Islamic history to life in a uniquely captivating and humanizing way. "I'm devastated," Ms. Jones told me after the book got spiked, adding, "I wanted to honor Aisha and all the wives of Muhammad by giving voice to them, remarkable women whose crucial roles in the shaping of Islam have so often been ignored -- silenced -- by historians."

Actually, I consider this unnecessary apologetics (even if true): if the book is genuinely blasphemous and offensive, there is just as much right to read it as if it's "giving voice to remarkable women."

There's a cynical part of me that suspects it is timed as a marketing ploy, much as Rushdie's The Satanic Verses had key, "injurious" passages forwarded to Indian outlets--because India has relatively strict censorship laws regarding insults to religion (not specifically Islam). In that case, it was a marketing ploy to affect a co-ordinated response, since censorship often confers automatic legitimacy upon a work, deserved or not. (I'd personally claim "not" for Rushdie's novel, though some people would disagree with me.)

But then, any possible machinations are beside the free speech point anyway.